Sorrow
The Aspiration to become a Master is rooted in
the Trance of Sorrow.
This trance is not simple and definite; indeed, it commonly begins in a limited
selfish form.
The imagination cannot pierce beyond terrestrial conditions, or the sense of
self grasp more than the natural consciousness.
One thinks at first no more than this: "there is nothing possible that is
good enough for me." Only as one grows by Initiation dies one approach the
asymptote "sabb(ace)e pi Dukkham" of the Buddha, when the relations of
subject and object, both expanded to infinity, are seen to be no less in the
bosom of the Great Curse than were their first avatars, the petty Ego and the
perceptible Universe.
So also for the transcending of this Trance of Sorrow. At first the victory
often comes by trick of mind; extending subject or object, as the case may be,
by an effort to escape reality, one seems for a moment to have defeated the
Equation "Everything is Sorrow"; but the clouds regather as the mind
recovers its equilibrium. Thus, one invents some "Heaven," defining it
arbitrarily as free from sorrow: only to find, on exact examination, that its
conditions are the same as those of "Earth."
Nor is there any rational issue from this hell of thought. The transcending of
the Trance of Sorrow is to be made by means of such other trances as the Higher
Beatific Vision, the Trance of Wonder, and others, even the Trance call the
Universal Joke, though this last is thereunto strangely akin!
There is this further consideration; that every subject of contemplation asks
only that the mind should become fixed upon it, in a degree far inferior to that
of true concentration such as secures Samadhi, to become evidently an illusion.
So much for a brief summary of the technical aspects of the matter. But all this
is remote indeed from the simplicity of the affirmation of the Book of the Law:
"Remember all ye that existence is pure joy: that all the sorrows are but
as shadows; they pass & are done; but there is that which remains."
Upon what can depend this perception, which claims to sweep away with the fire
of scorn the formidable batteries of all serious philosophical thought? The
solution must lie in the metaphysics of Thelema itself.
And here we come upon what is apparently a paradox of the most disconcerting
order. For The Book of the Law, anticipating the most subtle of recent
mathematical conceptions, that of the greatest genius of this generation, makes
the unit of existence consist in an Event, an Act of Marriage between Nuit and
Hadit; that is, the fulfillment of a certain Point-of-View. And is not the
procession of events the very conditions of Sorrow as opposed to the perfection
of "Pure Existence?" That is the old philosophy, a tangle of false
words: we see more clearly. Thus: Each Event is an Act of Love, and so generates
Joy: all existence is composed solely of such Events. But how comes it then that
there should be even an illusion of Sorrow?
Simply enough; by taking a partial and imperfect Vision. An example: in the
human body each cell is perfect, and the man is in good health; but should we
choose to regard almost any portion of the machine which sustains him, there
will appear various decompositions and the like, which might well be taken to
imply the most tragic Events. And this would inevitably be the case had we never
at any time seen the man as a whole, and understood the necessity of the divers
processes of nature which combine to make life.
ADDENDUM
Furthermore, to the normal or dualistic
consciousness it is precisely the shadows `which pass and are done' which
constitute perceptibly: what man "sees" is in fact just that which
obstructs the rays of light. This is the justification for the Buddha saying:
"Everything is Sorrow": in that word `Everything' he is most careful
to include specifically all those things which men count joyous. And this is not
really a paradox; for to him all reactions which produce consciousness are
ultimately sorrowful, as being disturbances of the Perfection of Peace, or (if
you prefer it) as obstructions to the free flow of Energy.
Joy and Sorrow are thus to him relative terms; subdivisions of one great sorrow,
which is manifestation. We need not trouble to contest this view; indeed, the
`Shadows' of which our book speaks are those interferences with Light caused by
the partiality of our apprehension.
The Whole is Infinite Perfection, and so is each Unit thereof. To transcend the
Trance of Sorrow it is thus sufficient to cancel the subject of the
contemplation by marrying it to its equal and opposite in imagination. We may
also pursue the analytical method, and resolve the complex which appears Sorrow
into its atoms. Each event of it is a sublime and joyous act of Love; or the
synthetical method, proceeding from the part to the Whole, with a similar
result.
And any one of the movements of the mind is (with assiduity and enthusiasm)
capable of transforming the Trance of Sorrow itself into the cognate Trance
attributed to Understanding, the Trance of Wonder.