The
basic precept of Astrology has been summed up with the phrase "As Above,
So Below." What is
displayed in the heavens is said to be mimicked on Earth.
Astrologers
once believed that the planets, luminaries, and stars introduced a force or
influence upon earthly
creatures and
events. One may
easily imagine
a Wise Man (or
Woman, aka. the Essenes) standing on his palatial balcony in 5,000
B.C.E., gazing intently
up at the
night sky,
carefully noting the passage of heavenly bodies. These notes would
then be compared to
the events of
the Kingdom, realm, of
region.
If
events of the current period matched previous events, the Magi would expect
similar planetary configurations in the heavens.
If the events of the period were original, careful notes would
be made
for future study. These notes
would of necessity been closely guarded and secret, least they fall into the
hands of a rival.
There
are accounts of Wise Men (Magi, Astrologer, same thing) who gained
great power
through contrived, controlling predictions that were not later born
out in reality. These gentlemen
and women usually lost their heads, but many lost their gonads- quite
literally. Job security fell
to those
who new their profession well or could talk very fast.
Many
religious cults, as cults today, frowned upon astrology schools. The students
were not conforming to what was religiously demanded of them by those in
power, and were often hacked
to pieces for their
efforts.
There
is a story told by a woman who was "regressed" to a "past
life," where she was an Astrology student. Those who were in her group
were all male youths under the tutelage of one purple
robed Teacher. Late one
night while they were going about their business learning the Hieros Logoi
(sacred accounts), another group who practised religious intolerance decided
to do a little butchering the same night.
The
astrology students were castrated and left to die.
If
this account is true or not, the point is the same: If
they had spent more time considering earthly
events (staying in the
Present), they may have been able to avoid the horror that night. (They might
have gone out for pizza instead).
Around
the time Rome was being built, those in power thought it a good idea to marry
off the Goddess (the Triple Lunar Goddess) to their Air Gods.
With the patriarchy taking power, something had to be done to diminish
the Goddess
in the
eyes of
mankind, and
make Her subservient to the Male.
Thus the goddess Juno was conceived, who would be the "goddess of
marriage."
Juno
was married off to Zeus, who didn't believe he was bound to any marriage vows
and liked to
frolic in any and all pastures available, begetting sons by the score.
No other goddess has been hurt by marriage more than Juno.
To
make the profane act of marriage complete, a new Sign was added to the Zodiac.
Libra, which is said to rule marriage as well as relationships in general, was
the twelfth Sign placed in the popular Zodiac. The Wise Men (and Women) of
this period thus had to alter their methods and ways of thinking.
The
oldest known astrology "chart" only had eight signs. House systems
were added later. It was square, and the planetary bodies had to be placed
precisely on the paper so that a straight edged graduated "ruler"
could be used to determine aspects. It seems that the "equal" or
"fixed" house system was the one used.
With
the advent of "houses," the astrologer could determine which arena
of life was to be involved. It
seems reasonable that the number of houses
should match the
number of Signs in the
Zodiac, right?
Well,
not really. There were usually eight houses used, even when the number of
Signs grew to twelve.
Today
the most popular methods of Astrology use twelve Signs and houses, using the
Tropical Zodiac in the West, Geocentric (Earth centred). There are many
variations available. One may use eliocentric
(Sun centred) astrology, or use the Sidereal Zodiac (which takes into
account the precession of the Equinox).
There
are many popular houses systems
in use today as
well. Porphyrus (spelling differs)
was a poet, astrologer, and scholar in ancient times.
He came up with a house
system called
"Porphyry," though I don't know anyone who uses it.
Most
astrologers today tend to believe that the heavenly bodies do not reach down
and push us about. Rather, the planets, luminaries, and stars "mimic"
Earthly events. Synchronistic in nature, they correlate instead of dictate.
This hands one's fate back to the individual, to augment or squander
as one
sees fit. The slight
comfort of Fate has been replaced by responsibility for one's actions.
A
few astrologers
still portend death and destruction from the "astrological
chart." This mode of thinking (a belief
pattern based on
preconceived ideas) is almost
extinct. One may stay on the rail road tracks, deeming it "fate" has
said one must be mashed
by the train,
or one
may say "Screw it," and step to the side and let fate pass.
It is one's right and responsibility to take charge
of one's life events.
Still,
one always has the right to be squashed by one's "trains." If you
refuse to drink, you are
allowed to die of thirst. It's
your right.
The
perceptions of "Fate Versus Free Will" seems to lean
towards "free will"
for the individual in the current astrological community, but the question of
the "Fate of Nations," and the rulers of
Nations, is still hotly disputed.
There
are arguments
that a Nation must follow what is "Fated," and that those
closely connected to that Nation are heavily
minified in their rights to act freely.
It is well documented that a Nation in trouble always produces a single
individual to correct the problem.
Abe
Lincoln believed in Fate, and was said to know when he would die and how. Did
he have the Right to choose? Since
he was closely connected to the United States and the Civil War, I doubt it.
Kennedy
chose to ignore warnings from "psychics," we've been told to
believe, and ended up slaughtered
on national television, presumably by the hand of Cuba, Castro. But did he
have a choice? I believe
not.
Someone
ponderously, corpulently, grossly into religious intolerance mentioned to me
that "The One True God destroys Nations," while individuals destroy
themselves, I will add. Bending
his idea of "God" to a non anthropomorphic deity, we could say that
"The Universe" takes care of nations and leaves the individual to
fend for her or his self.
Astrology
does not predict. It points to
probabilities, not unequivocal, assured events. Any likely event can be
circumnavigated if one knows
about it first.
This is why I believe Astrology to be the single most useful tool for
taking responsibility for one's life.
The question "Is Astrology valid?" is one that I cannot answer competently. It is always best to question everything, and take nothing as it is offered (without the arena of astrology as well as within). I leave this question to others for exploration.